Editorial Policies
Editorial and Peer-Review Process
Journal of Biomedicine and Biochemistry (JBB)
Journal of Biomedicine and Biochemistry (JBB) is committed to ensuring a rigorous, transparent, and ethical editorial and peer-review process aligned with international standards, including COPE and ICMJE.
1 Initial Editorial Assessment
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial team to evaluate:
- Relevance to the journal's aims and scope
- Scientific soundness and originality
- Compliance with author guidelines and ethical standards
- Quality of English language and clarity of presentation
Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's minimum requirements — stylistically, linguistically, or ethically — may be returned to authors without entering the full peer-review process.
2 Assignment to Editorial Board Member
If deemed suitable for further consideration, the manuscript is assigned to an Editorial Board Member with subject-matter expertise. The assigned editor manages the peer-review process, selects qualified reviewers, and ensures the integrity, fairness, and confidentiality of the review.
3 Peer-Review Process
JBB follows a double-blind peer-review system. Reviewers may recommend acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection based on:
- Scientific validity and methodological rigor
- Significance and originality of results
- Accuracy of data interpretation
- Ethical compliance and reporting transparency
- Appropriateness of citations and research context
Editors may invite additional reviewers when needed, or request further clarifications, analyses, or revisions.
4 Editorial Decisions
After the completion of the peer-review process, the Managing Editor provides a recommendation. The Editor-in-Chief retains full authority to make the final decision on acceptance, revision, or rejection. All decisions are made independently, free from conflicts of interest, and based solely on academic merit.
5 Author Responsibilities
By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that:
- The work is original, has not been previously published (in whole or in part), and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- The manuscript complies with JBB's ethical standards, including COPE guidelines.
- All authors meet authorship criteria, approve the final manuscript version, and agree to its submission.
- The corresponding author is authorized to communicate with the journal on behalf of all co-authors.
- The manuscript adheres to the journal's stylistic, bibliographic, and language standards.
- Any potential conflicts of interest are transparently declared.
6 Editorial Authority During Review
Editors may, at any stage of the process:
- Request major or minor revisions
- Seek additional peer reviewers
- Reject the manuscript if ethical concerns arise or if revisions remain insufficient
The editorial office maintains the right to withdraw a manuscript from review if serious breaches of publication ethics are detected.
