Editorial and Peer-Review Process

Journal of Biomedicine and Biochemistry (JBB)

Journal of Biomedicine and Biochemistry (JBB) is committed to ensuring a rigorous, transparent, and ethical editorial and peer-review process aligned with international standards, including COPE and ICMJE.

1 Initial Editorial Assessment

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial team to evaluate:

  • Relevance to the journal's aims and scope
  • Scientific soundness and originality
  • Compliance with author guidelines and ethical standards
  • Quality of English language and clarity of presentation

Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's minimum requirements — stylistically, linguistically, or ethically — may be returned to authors without entering the full peer-review process.

2 Assignment to Editorial Board Member

If deemed suitable for further consideration, the manuscript is assigned to an Editorial Board Member with subject-matter expertise. The assigned editor manages the peer-review process, selects qualified reviewers, and ensures the integrity, fairness, and confidentiality of the review.

3 Peer-Review Process

JBB follows a double-blind peer-review system. Reviewers may recommend acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection based on:

  • Scientific validity and methodological rigor
  • Significance and originality of results
  • Accuracy of data interpretation
  • Ethical compliance and reporting transparency
  • Appropriateness of citations and research context

Editors may invite additional reviewers when needed, or request further clarifications, analyses, or revisions.

4 Editorial Decisions

After the completion of the peer-review process, the Managing Editor provides a recommendation. The Editor-in-Chief retains full authority to make the final decision on acceptance, revision, or rejection. All decisions are made independently, free from conflicts of interest, and based solely on academic merit.

5 Author Responsibilities

By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that:

  • The work is original, has not been previously published (in whole or in part), and is not under consideration elsewhere.
  • The manuscript complies with JBB's ethical standards, including COPE guidelines.
  • All authors meet authorship criteria, approve the final manuscript version, and agree to its submission.
  • The corresponding author is authorized to communicate with the journal on behalf of all co-authors.
  • The manuscript adheres to the journal's stylistic, bibliographic, and language standards.
  • Any potential conflicts of interest are transparently declared.

6 Editorial Authority During Review

Editors may, at any stage of the process:

  • Request major or minor revisions
  • Seek additional peer reviewers
  • Reject the manuscript if ethical concerns arise or if revisions remain insufficient

The editorial office maintains the right to withdraw a manuscript from review if serious breaches of publication ethics are detected.